financial watchdog plan

Money Matters...
Post Reply
User avatar
Calm Chaos Official Cat Herder
Posts: 3045
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:48 am
Location: Outta My Frakkin Mind

financial watchdog plan

Post by MzSnowleopard » Wed May 20, 2009 6:40 pm

SEC head objects to Obama financial watchdog plan

- By MARTIN CRUTSINGER and MARCY GORDON, Associated Press Writers Martin Crutsinger And Marcy Gordon, Associated Press Writers

WASHINGTON – The head of the Securities and Exchange Commission is objecting to a plan being considered by the Obama administration to create a new financial watchdog to protect consumers.

SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said such a new entity, which was discussed Tuesday night by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and other officials, would reduce the SEC's authority and damage government protection of investors.

"I question pretty profoundly any model that would try to move investor protection functions out of the Securities and Exchange Commission," Schapiro said Wednesday.

That couldn't be done "without really damaging the fabric of the entire investor protection regime," she told reporters.

The proposal the administration was considering would centralize the enforcement of laws that protect consumers of financial products, such as credit cards, mortgages and mutual funds. That effort currently is spread across a number of federal and state agencies, including the SEC, with oversight of mutual funds and other investments, the Federal Reserve and Federal Trade Commission.

Any changes to the nation's financial rule book and oversight will require congressional action and it's unclear whether lawmakers will unite behind a single approach this year.

Schapiro's comments marked her first sharp public breach with the administration over the shape of the overhaul of rules designed to prevent another massive financial breakdown. Schapiro has in recent weeks affirmed in testimony to Congress, which is debating the changes, her position that the SEC must play a key role as an independent watchdog protecting investors in any new financial regulation system.

Schapiro also has said she favors the idea floated recently by Sheila Bair, the head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., for a new "systemic risk council" to monitor large institutions against financial threats that would include the Treasury Department, Fed, FDIC and SEC. The White House, by contrast, leans toward recommending that the Fed alone become the new supercop for "too big to fail" financial companies capable of setting off another meltdown.

Officials said the administration has been exploring the new approach in meetings over the past few days with executives of the financial industry. It was discussed at a dinner Tuesday at the Treasury Department attended by Geithner and Lawrence Summers, director of President Barack Obama's National Economic Council.

Schapiro said Wednesday she has been engaged with administration officials in offering her views on the issue, and didn't view the proposal as in its final form.

"I certainly hope we'll be refining it," she said. "I don't think it's a concrete proposal by any means at this point."

An administration official who confirmed that the dinner had taken place said no final decisions had been reached.

Under one possible approach, some federal banking agencies might be combined and some powers over consumer products might be consolidated into a new body.

An industry official said the administration supported the concept that already has been introduced in legislation by several senators. This official said the administration may offer its own approach to the issue.

Geithner has said extensive changes were needed to make sure that the current financial crisis, the worst in seven decades, is never repeated. In prepared remarks to the Senate Banking Committee Wednesday, Geithner said new financial products have resulted in benefits, but lax regulation has exposed Americans to abuses. He said government rules should ensure that financial choices are clear, reasonable and appropriate.

The officials who spoke late Tuesday did so on condition that their names not be used because the administration was not ready to unveil a proposal.

Treasury issued a statement late Tuesday that called the dinner "one of a series of meetings with a wide range of relevant constituencies and experts" to seek views on regulatory reform. "No decisions have been made but the administration is actively seeking various viewpoints as it puts together its framework."

A leading proponent of the commission approach has been Harvard University professor Elizabeth Warren, who is the head of the Congressional Oversight Panel for the government's $700 billion financial rescue effort.

Warren argued in a 2007 article that the government needed to do a better job of protecting homeowners who take out mortgages and consumers of other increasingly complex financial products.

Sens. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., introduced legislation earlier this year that would create a commission like the one proposed by Warren.

Some industry groups already have expressed opposition to the plan.

The Financial Services Roundtable, which represents some of the biggest institutions in the country, has argued that it would be a mistake to separate the regulation of financial products from the regulators who oversee the institutions selling those products.

It was unclear whether the administration will propose creating a new federal agency to house the commission or placing the commission under an existing agency.

The administration is expected to unveil its proposal in the next few weeks as it pushes ahead with a sweeping effort to overhaul the government's financial regulatory system.

The administration already has put forward some broad principles for financial regulatory overhaul, including creation of new powers to allow authorities to take over major financial institutions that represent a threat to the system.


Associated Press writer Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.
He who trims himself to suit everyone soon whittles himself away. - Raymond Hull
Stats / Web Site / Blog

User avatar
Dark Angel
Calm Chaos Militia Commander
Posts: 2607
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 11:43 pm
Location: California, USA

Post by Dark Angel » Thu May 21, 2009 6:26 am

Well lets see...the SEC has been fairly useless with consumer financial disaster and Madoff Ponzie scheme...but then again the FED is not where I'd put the power...they already have way to much control over our daily lives...nor would I just leave it the way it is...what is needed is a body with some real teeth that is not tied to the industry in any way, answers to the people and does not have a lifetime appointment, yet serves long enough to know what they are doing. We need an entity with a backbone and a real will to listen investigate and enforce. I also think if a company gets into predatory lending or illegal actions they should automatically forfeit any right to property that they have lent against...that would make them think twice about breaking the law...we also need to get rid of the idea of "white collar crime" as being victimless...because it's not...I'd start there for now and see how quickly the industry changes.

Remember all the companies that suddenly got they hand caught in the cookie jar a few years back when everyone it seemed was cooking their books...that whole thing could have been prevented if we made everyone adhere to a simple math formulas... 1+1=2 and 2-1=1 ...lets start using real math again when calculating profit and loss. Don't claim it till you've got it.

"As I walk throught the valley of the shadow of death I have no fear,
because I'm the meanest M***** F***** in the whole valley."
-Gen. George S. Patton

User avatar
Keeper of the Calm
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 2:27 am
Location: OZ!

Post by Enigma » Fri May 22, 2009 2:56 pm

They need real checks and balances.

That will never happen at the fed as there have been none for the last 100 years.

An SEC based regulatory framework has failed dismally (in several countries).

I mean who are the Fed boys accountable to? Arguably they created this mess with low interest rates for too long and what is the recourse for this huge mistake... nothing.

Perhaps the gold standard wasn't such a bad idea. However it would mean spending within your means (as a country).
Belief gets in the way of learning.


Post Reply

Return to “World Finance”